HIP-3: Jin Multimodal AI Architecture
Abstract
This proposal defines the Jin architecture, Hanzo's unified multimodal AI framework supporting text, vision, audio, and 3D modalities through joint embedding spaces. Jin represents our next-generation foundational model with variants from nano (1B) to ultra (1T+) parameters, featuring diffusion transformer MoE architectures and cross-modal understanding.
Repository: github.com/hanzoai/jin
Motivation
Current multimodal models suffer from:
- Modality Silos: Separate encoders lose cross-modal relationships
- Scale Limitations: Difficulty scaling to trillion+ parameters
- Training Inefficiency: Redundant learning across modalities
- Inference Bottlenecks: Sequential processing of modalities
- Limited 3D Understanding: Poor spatial reasoning capabilities
Jin addresses these through unified joint embedding spaces with efficient MoE routing.
Specification
Model Architecture
class JinArchitecture:
"""
Jin: Unified multimodal AI with joint embedding spaces
"""
# Core Configuration
embedding_dim = 8192 # Unified embedding dimension
num_experts = 128 # MoE experts
experts_per_token = 8 # Active experts
# Modality Encoders
text_encoder = "RoPE Transformer"
vision_encoder = "DiT (Diffusion Transformer)"
audio_encoder = "Conformer"
mesh_encoder = "Point Transformer v3"
# Joint Embedding
joint_space = "Hyperbolic manifold"
alignment = "Contrastive + Diffusion"
Model Variants
| Model | Parameters | Experts | Context | Modalities | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jin-nano | 1B | 8 | 8K | Text, Vision | Edge devices, mobile |
| Jin-mini | 7B | 16 | 32K | Text, Vision, Audio | Personal assistants |
| Jin-base | 32B | 32 | 64K | All | Standard deployment |
| Jin-large | 175B | 64 | 128K | All + Video | Enterprise AI |
| Jin-ultra | 1T+ | 128 | 256K | All + Specialized | Research, AGI |
Joint Embedding Space
Embedding Structure:
Dimension: 8192
Geometry: Hyperbolic (Poincaré ball)
Radius: 1.0
Modality Projections:
Text → Embedding:
- Byte-level tokenization
- RoPE position encoding
- Layer normalization
Vision → Embedding:
- Patch-based encoding (16x16)
- 2D RoPE for positions
- Multi-scale features
Audio → Embedding:
- Mel-spectrogram input
- Conformer blocks
- Temporal pooling
3D → Embedding:
- Point cloud sampling (2048 points)
- KNN graph construction
- Geometric features
Mixture of Experts (MoE)
class JinMoE:
def forward(self, x, modality):
# Router network
router_logits = self.router(x)
expert_weights = torch.topk(router_logits, k=8)
# Expert execution
expert_outputs = []
for idx, weight in expert_weights:
expert = self.experts[idx]
output = expert(x, modality)
expert_outputs.append(weight * output)
# Combine expert outputs
return sum(expert_outputs)
Training Pipeline
Phase 1: Unimodal Pretraining
Text Pretraining:
Data: 15T tokens (web, books, code, papers)
Objective: Next token prediction
Duration: 4 weeks on 1024 H100s
Vision Pretraining:
Data: 10B images
Objective: DINO v3 + MAE
Duration: 2 weeks on 512 H100s
Audio Pretraining:
Data: 1M hours
Objective: Wav2vec 2.0
Duration: 1 week on 256 H100s
3D Pretraining:
Data: 100M 3D objects
Objective: Point-BERT
Duration: 1 week on 256 H100s
Phase 2: Joint Alignment
Alignment Training:
Pairs:
- Text-Image: 5B pairs
- Text-Audio: 100M pairs
- Text-3D: 10M pairs
- Image-Audio: 50M pairs
Objectives:
- Contrastive learning (CLIP-style)
- Diffusion alignment
- Cycle consistency
Duration: 2 weeks on 1024 H100s
Phase 3: Instruction Tuning
Instruction Data:
- Text instructions: 10M examples
- Multimodal tasks: 5M examples
- Tool use: 1M examples
- Reasoning: 1M examples
Fine-tuning:
Method: LoRA + QLoRA
Rank: 256
Alpha: 512
Duration: 1 week on 512 H100s
Inference Optimization
class JinInference:
"""
Optimized inference with caching and batching
"""
def __init__(self):
self.kv_cache = {}
self.expert_cache = {}
def generate(self, inputs, max_tokens=2048):
# Modality routing
modalities = self.detect_modalities(inputs)
# Parallel encoding
embeddings = self.parallel_encode(inputs, modalities)
# Cached decoding
outputs = []
for i in range(max_tokens):
logits = self.decode_step(embeddings, self.kv_cache)
token = self.sample(logits)
outputs.append(token)
if token == self.eos_token:
break
return outputs
Deployment Configurations
Edge Deployment (Jin-nano)
Quantization: INT4
Memory: <4GB
Latency: <50ms first token
Throughput: >100 tokens/sec
Devices: iPhone 15+, Pixel 8+
Cloud Deployment (Jin-base)
Quantization: FP16/BF16
Memory: 64GB (2x A100)
Latency: <20ms first token
Throughput: >1000 tokens/sec
Scaling: Horizontal via ray.io
Enterprise Deployment (Jin-large)
Quantization: FP16
Memory: 350GB (8x A100)
Latency: <30ms first token
Throughput: >500 tokens/sec
Features: Multi-tenancy, audit logs
API Specification
# Python SDK
from hanzoai import Jin
model = Jin("jin-base")
# Text generation
response = model.generate("Explain quantum computing")
# Multimodal generation
response = model.generate([
{"type": "text", "content": "Describe this image"},
{"type": "image", "content": image_bytes}
])
# Cross-modal generation
response = model.generate(
prompt="Generate an image of a sunset",
modality_out="image"
)
# 3D generation
response = model.generate(
prompt="Create a 3D model of a chair",
modality_out="mesh"
)
Performance Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Jin-nano | Jin-base | Jin-large | GPT-4V | Gemini Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 72.3 | 86.4 | 91.2 | 86.4 | 90.0 |
| HumanEval | 65.2 | 78.9 | 85.6 | 67.0 | 74.4 |
| VQA v2 | 78.5 | 84.2 | 88.7 | 77.2 | 82.3 |
| AudioCaps | 71.3 | 82.6 | 87.4 | N/A | 79.1 |
| ShapeNet | 68.9 | 79.4 | 84.1 | N/A | N/A |
Integration with HLLMs
Jin models can be deployed as base models for HLLMs (HIP-2):
class HLLM_Jin(HLLM):
"""
HLLM with Jin as base model
"""
def __init__(self):
self.base_model = Jin("jin-base")
self.hamiltonian = HamiltonianDynamics()
self.active_inference = ActiveInference()
def forward(self, x):
# Jin embedding
embeddings = self.base_model.encode(x)
# Hamiltonian evolution
h_state = self.hamiltonian(embeddings)
# Active inference planning
actions = self.active_inference.plan(h_state)
return self.base_model.decode(actions)
Rationale
Why Joint Embedding Spaces?
Joint embedding enables:
- True multimodal understanding: Shared representations across modalities
- Zero-shot transfer: Apply learning from one modality to another
- Efficient scaling: Single model instead of multiple specialists
- Emergent capabilities: Cross-modal reasoning emerges naturally
Why Hyperbolic Geometry?
Hyperbolic spaces offer:
- Hierarchical representation: Natural for tree-like structures
- Exponential capacity: More representational power
- Better separation: Improved clustering of concepts
- Semantic preservation: Maintains relationships
Why MoE Architecture?
Mixture of Experts provides:
- Conditional computation: Only activate relevant experts
- Efficient scaling: Scale to trillions of parameters
- Specialization: Experts can specialize by modality/task
- Fast inference: Sparse activation reduces compute
Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Jin-nano (Q1 2025)
- 1B parameter model
- Text + Vision modalities
- Edge deployment ready
- Open source release
Phase 2: Jin-base (Q2 2025)
- 32B parameter model
- All core modalities
- Cloud deployment
- API access
Phase 3: Jin-large (Q3 2025)
- 175B parameter model
- Video support
- Enterprise features
- Fine-tuning API
Phase 4: Jin-ultra (Q4 2025+)
- 1T+ parameter model
- Specialized modalities
- AGI research
- Academic partnerships
Security Considerations
Model Security
- Watermarking: Invisible watermarks in generated content
- Safety filters: Multimodal content filtering
- Adversarial robustness: Defense against attacks
- Privacy: No training data memorization
Deployment Security
- TEE inference: Secure enclaves for sensitive data
- Encrypted models: Model encryption at rest
- Access control: Fine-grained permissions
- Audit logging: Complete inference trails
References
- Flamingo: Visual Language Model
- Gemini: Multimodal Models
- Switch Transformers: MoE
- Hyperbolic Neural Networks
- HIP-2: HLLMs Specification
- Jin Repository
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.