HIPsHanzo Proposals
Back to HIPs
HIP-0027DraftStandards TrackInfrastructure

Secrets Management Standard

Hanzo AI Team
Created: 2025-01-15

HIP-0027: Secrets Management Standard

Abstract

There is one KMS surface: api.hanzo.ai/v1/kms. It answers path / env / name, resolving to /orgs/<org>/<path>/<NAME>, and it is the only store any service reads. The /api/v1/ and /api/v3/ surface earlier revisions of this HIP documented is gone; it carried the /api/ prefix the estate does not use (HIP-0119) and it returns 404.

Where a secret sits is HIP-0136's question, not this one's. That HIP is normative for the path, and it supersedes the project-per-service layout §Secret Organization Model used to specify. This HIP covers what KMS is, how a service authenticates to it, and how the KMSSecret CRD gets a value into a pod.

This proposal defines the secrets management standard for the Hanzo ecosystem. Hanzo KMS is the centralized, auditable, Kubernetes-native secret store for all Hanzo services, built on the canonical luxfi/kms primitives. It replaces scattered environment variables, CI/CD secrets, and manual kubectl create secret operations with a single source of truth.

Every secret in the Hanzo ecosystem --- API keys, database credentials, OAuth client secrets, encryption keys --- flows through KMS. Services authenticate via Universal Auth (machine identity with client ID/secret), receive a short-lived bearer token, and fetch secrets at runtime. In Kubernetes, the KMSSecret custom resource automates syncing secrets from KMS into native Secret objects, eliminating human involvement in the secret lifecycle.

Repository: github.com/luxfi/kms — hanzoai/kms is archived Production: https://kms.hanzo.ai Docker: ghcr.io/luxfi/kms

Motivation

Before KMS, Hanzo secrets were managed through a patchwork of mechanisms:

  1. Hardcoded in compose files: compose.yml files contained plaintext credentials. Anyone with repository access could read database passwords.
  2. GitHub Actions secrets: CI/CD credentials lived in GitHub's secret store, invisible to audit and impossible to rotate without manual updates to every workflow.
  3. Manual kubectl: Operators ran kubectl create secret by hand, introducing drift between what was deployed and what was documented.
  4. Duplicated across services: The same SQL password appeared in IAM, Cloud, Console, and Platform deployments --- each copy managed independently.
  5. No audit trail: When a secret was accessed, changed, or leaked, there was no way to know who did what, when.

These problems compound at scale. With 15+ services on hanzo-k8s and growing, manual secrets management became the single largest operational risk.

Design Philosophy

Why our own KMS over HashiCorp Vault

HashiCorp Vault is the industry default for secrets management, but it carries significant operational overhead:

  • Unseal ceremony: Vault starts sealed. Every restart (node reboot, deployment, OOM kill) requires unseal keys. In a two-replica K8s deployment, this means manual intervention or complex auto-unseal configurations with cloud KMS --- defeating the purpose of self-hosting.
  • HA complexity: Vault HA requires Raft consensus or Consul backend. Both add operational surfaces. Consul alone is a distributed system that needs its own monitoring, backup, and upgrade procedures.
  • Configuration language: Vault policies use HCL, a domain-specific language that developers must learn. Access control requires writing and deploying policy files.
  • No native UI for developers: Vault's UI exists but is designed for operators. Developers adding a new API key must understand mount paths, engines, and policy bindings.

The design was chosen because:

  • Modern UI: Developers can browse projects, environments, and secrets in a web interface that resembles a .env file editor. No learning curve.
  • Environment-based organization: Secrets are organized as project > environment > folder > key-value, which maps directly to our dev/staging/ production workflow.
  • Built-in secret rotation: the server supports automatic rotation for database credentials and API keys without external tooling.
  • Kubernetes operator: our own operator provides the KMSSecret CRD in one API group, kms.hanzo.ai/v1. The second group this HIP used to name, secrets.lux.network, is not installed; kmssecrets.kms.hanzo.ai is the only one, and universe declares it.
  • Open source with BSL: Business Source License allows self-hosting and modification. We fork, rebrand, and deploy without vendor lock-in.
  • Single binary: the server is a single Go binary with SQL and KV backends --- the same infrastructure we already operate for other services.

Why Not AWS Secrets Manager or GCP Secret Manager

Cloud-managed secret services (AWS Secrets Manager, GCP Secret Manager, Azure Key Vault) are excellent --- for workloads that will never leave that cloud. Hanzo's infrastructure has specific constraints:

  • Multi-cloud portability: Our K8s clusters run on DigitalOcean today. We may move to bare metal, Hetzner, or a different cloud provider. Managed secret services are inherently cloud-locked: AWS Secrets Manager is only accessible from AWS networks without complex VPN/peering configurations.
  • Cost at scale: AWS Secrets Manager charges $0.40/secret/month plus $0.05 per 10,000 API calls. With 200+ secrets across environments and services polling every 60 seconds, costs become non-trivial and unpredictable.
  • Unified access model: A self-hosted KMS means every service --- whether running in K8s, in CI/CD, or on a developer's laptop --- uses the same HTTPS API. No IAM roles, service accounts, or cloud-specific SDKs required.
  • Data sovereignty: Some customers and compliance frameworks require that encryption keys and credentials never leave infrastructure we control. Self-hosted KMS satisfies this requirement.

Why the KMSSecret CRD

Kubernetes-native secret sync via Custom Resource Definitions eliminates the most error-prone step in the secret lifecycle: getting secrets from the source of truth into the cluster where workloads consume them.

Without the CRD, the workflow is:

  1. Operator adds secret to KMS UI
  2. Operator runs kubectl create secret with the new value
  3. Operator restarts the affected deployment
  4. Hope that step 2 was not forgotten, typo-free, and applied to the correct namespace

With the CRD, the workflow is:

  1. Operator adds secret to KMS UI
  2. The KMS Operator detects the change within resyncInterval seconds
  3. The K8s Secret is updated automatically
  4. Workloads consuming the secret via envFrom or valueFrom pick up the change on next pod restart (or immediately if using mounted volumes)

Steps 2-4 are automated. No human in the loop after step 1.

Specification

Secret Organization Model

Secrets in KMS are organized hierarchically:

Organization
  └── Project
        └── Environment
              └── Folder
                    └── Key = Value

Organizations

Top-level organizational boundary. Maps to Hanzo business units:

OrganizationPurpose
hanzoHanzo AI core services
luxLux blockchain infrastructure
zooZoo Labs Foundation services
parsPars network services

Projects and paths

HIP-0136 is normative here. A secret is addressed by four coordinates and nothing else — <org>/<app>/<NAME>@<env> — where app is the app that READS the secret and NAME is exactly the environment variable the value becomes.

Earlier revisions of this HIP specified a project per deployable service (hanzo-iam, gateway, chat, cloud, console, …) so that "a compromised service identity can only read its own secrets". That is not what shipped: every kmsSecrets declaration in the fleet takes the org's project and distinguishes the service by path alone. The one exception is base, which holds its own project with its own machine identity, and which HIP-0136 explicitly protects from being folded in — it carries the IAM signing keys, and moving them into the shared project would let every app in the namespace read them.

The isolation goal is not superseded; it is unmet. One project per org means one machine identity per namespace, so secretsPath organizes and does not authorize. Closing that gap means one machine identity per app — a change to identity topology, and its own proposal. See §Security.

Environments

Standard environment slugs. Every project MUST have these:

SlugPurpose
prodlive services; the chart default and the only environment on this plane

default is not an environment. It is a leaked upstream spelling, and it is what made a present secret read as absent for eighteen hours: a query at the right path and the wrong env returns total: 0, which is indistinguishable from a secret that never existed (HIP-0136 §Motivation).

Folders

Optional sub-grouping within environments. Used for organizing large projects. Example: /database/, /api-keys/, /oauth/.

Authenticating, and reading a secret

A service authenticates as itself with the machine identity IAM already issued it — client_credentials, client_secret_basic, and RFC 8707 resource naming the KMS it is calling (HIP-0111). There is no second credential type and no auth stack of KMS's own; IAM is the sole authority for identity and tokens.

Step 1: get an access token

POST https://hanzo.id/v1/iam/oauth/token
Authorization: Basic base64(clientId:clientSecret)
grant_type=client_credentials&resource=hanzo-kms

Step 2: read the secret

GET https://api.hanzo.ai/v1/kms/secrets?path=/gateway&env=prod&name=IAM_CLIENT_SECRET
Authorization: Bearer <access token>

The three query parameters are the address: path names the app that reads the secret, name is exactly the environment variable it becomes, env is prod. They resolve to /orgs/<org>/<path>/<NAME>, and the org comes from the validated token, never from the request — a caller that could name its own org could read another tenant's store.

A read that returns nothing is not evidence of absence. A path-filtered list returning total: 0 and a genuinely empty store are the same response, and treating them as the same is how a migration deletes a live credential. Absence is established only by enumerating the store the chart actually reads (HIP-0136 §Migration).

Step 3: use it

The value is injected into the service's runtime configuration. In Kubernetes it does not travel this path at all: the KMSSecret controller reads it and writes a native Secret the pod mounts, which is the next section.

Machine Identity Lifecycle

Each service is represented by a Machine Identity in KMS. The identity lifecycle follows these steps:

  1. Create Identity: In the KMS UI, create a Machine Identity with a descriptive name (e.g., iam-service, gateway-service).
  2. Enable Universal Auth: Attach Universal Auth credentials to the identity. KMS generates a clientId and clientSecret.
  3. Grant Project Access: Assign the identity to the relevant project with the minimum required role (typically Viewer for read-only secret access).
  4. Bootstrap Credentials: Store the clientId and clientSecret in the target environment (K8s secret, CI/CD variable, etc.).
  5. Rotate Periodically: Regenerate the clientSecret and update the bootstrap credential. The clientId remains stable.

KMSSecret Custom Resource Definition

The KMSSecret CRD is the Kubernetes-native interface for syncing secrets from KMS into the cluster.

API Group and Version

apiVersion: secrets.lux.network/v1alpha1
kind: KMSSecret

Full Specification

apiVersion: secrets.lux.network/v1alpha1
kind: KMSSecret
metadata:
  name: <service>-kms-sync
  namespace: hanzo
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/name: <service>
    app.kubernetes.io/component: secrets
    app.kubernetes.io/part-of: hanzo-universe
spec:
  # KMS API endpoint
  hostAPI: https://kms.hanzo.ai

  # How often (in seconds) to re-sync secrets from KMS
  # Lower values = faster propagation, higher API load
  # Recommended: 60 for production, 30 for staging
  resyncInterval: 60

  # Authentication configuration
  authentication:
    universalAuth:
      credentialsRef:
        # K8s Secret containing clientId and clientSecret
        secretName: <service>-kms-auth
        secretNamespace: hanzo
      secretsScope:
        # KMS project slug
        projectSlug: <project-slug>
        # KMS environment slug
        envSlug: production
        # Path within the environment
        secretsPath: /

  # Target K8s Secret to create/update
  managedSecretReference:
    secretName: <service>-secrets
    secretNamespace: hanzo
    secretType: Opaque

Bootstrap Secret

Every KMSSecret resource references a bootstrap secret containing the Machine Identity credentials. This is the ONE secret that must be created manually:

kubectl create secret generic <service>-kms-auth \
  --from-literal=clientId=<machine-identity-client-id> \
  --from-literal=clientSecret=<machine-identity-client-secret> \
  --dry-run=client -o yaml | kubectl apply -f -

This is an intentional design constraint. The bootstrap secret is a "root of trust" --- it cannot be managed by the system it bootstraps.

CI/CD integration

CI is Hanzo Git Actions executed by act_runner, and the pipeline is one reusable workflow in hanzoai/ci (HIP-0036). A repository does not write its own KMS fetch: the reusable workflow does it, once, using the build's machine identity, and the secret is addressed at hanzo/deploy/<NAME>@prod.

The only durable value a repository stores is that machine identity, and it is set on the forge, which is what executes the workflow.

Two things a build must not be given, because it does not need them: a cloud provider token or kubeconfig (it does not deploy — HIP-0036 §Deployment), and any upstream vendor credential a service needs at runtime (that is egress's custody — HIP-0143).

Secret Rotation Policy

Secret TypeRotation FrequencyMethod
Database passwords90 daysKMS auto-rotation
API keys (third-party)90 daysManual + KMS update
OAuth client secrets180 daysCoordinated with IAM
Encryption keys365 daysKey versioning
Machine Identity secrets180 daysKMS regenerate
JWT signing keys90 daysRolling deployment

Audit Logging

KMS logs every secret access with:

  • Who: Machine Identity ID or user email
  • What: Secret key name (never the value)
  • When: ISO 8601 timestamp
  • Where: Source IP address
  • Action: read, create, update, delete
  • Project: Project slug and environment

Audit logs are retained for 365 days and are queryable via the KMS API:

GET /v1/kms/audit?path=<path>&from=2026-01-01&to=2026-01-31
Authorization: Bearer <admin-token>

Implementation

Production Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                   Kubernetes cluster                    │
│                                                         │
│  ┌───────────┐     ┌────────────────┐                   │
│  │ KMS (x2)  │────▶│ SQL            │                   │
│  │ port 8080 │     │ (kms database) │                   │
│  └─────┬─────┘     └────────────────┘                   │
│        │                                                │
│        │           ┌────────────────┐                   │
│        └──────────▶│ KV             │                   │
│                    │ (session/cache)│                   │
│                    └────────────────┘                   │
│                                                         │
│  ┌──────────────────┐                                   │
│  │ KMS Operator      │    watches KMSSecret CRDs        │
│  │ (kms-operator)    │───▶ syncs to K8s Secrets         │
│  └──────────────────┘                                   │
│                                                         │
│  ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐   │
│  │   IAM    │ │ Gateway  │ │   Chat   │ │  Cloud   │   │
│  │ (reads)  │ │ (reads)  │ │ (reads)  │ │ (reads)  │   │
│  └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
          ▲
          │ HTTPS (port 443 via Ingress)
          │
    ┌─────┴──────┐
    │ CI/CD      │  GitHub Actions, developer laptops
    │ (reads)    │
    └────────────┘

Deployment Specification

KMS runs as a Deployment with 2 replicas for high availability:

spec:
  replicas: 2
  strategy:
    type: RollingUpdate
    rollingUpdate:
      maxSurge: 1
      maxUnavailable: 0

Pod anti-affinity ensures replicas land on different nodes:

affinity:
  podAntiAffinity:
    preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution:
    - weight: 100
      podAffinityTerm:
        labelSelector:
          matchExpressions:
          - key: app
            operator: In
            values: ["kms"]
        topologyKey: kubernetes.io/hostname

Helm Chart: kms-standalone

The kms-standalone Helm chart supports automated bootstrap:

kms:
  autoBootstrap:
    enabled: true
    # Create additional organizations beyond the default
    additionalOrganizations:
      - hanzo
      - lux
      - zoo
      - pars
    # Grant org-admin to these emails during org creation
    additionalOrganizationAdminEmails:
      - [email protected]
    # Secret template key for bootstrap token
    additionalOrganizationsTokenSecretKey: token

This ensures that on first deployment, all four organizations exist and the specified admin has access across all of them.

Resource Requirements

resources:
  requests:
    memory: "512Mi"
    cpu: "250m"
  limits:
    memory: "2Gi"
    cpu: "1000m"

Health Checks

readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /healthz
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 60
  periodSeconds: 10

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /healthz
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 120
  periodSeconds: 30

KMS's Own Secrets (Bootstrap Problem)

KMS cannot fetch its own master key from the KMS it is. That circularity is irreducible — every secret store has one — and it is stated here rather than hidden.

What is reducible is how much sits inside it. The bootstrap set is the master key and the identity it authenticates with, held as a K8s Secret created once at cluster provisioning and recorded offline. It is deliberately not a database connection string and a cache URL: those were in the bootstrap set only because KMS ran on a database of its own, and a store that keeps per-org encrypted files (HIP-1134) has no such connection to bootstrap. Every value that leaves the bootstrap set is one fewer secret living outside the system that manages secrets.

stringData is not an escape hatch anywhere else. Charts carry references and never values, and templates/kmssecret.yaml has no field that would accept one — on purpose, and this HIP does not add one.

Security

Threat Model

ThreatMitigation
Compromised service identityScoped to single project; revoke identity immediately
KMS database breachAll secrets encrypted at rest with ROOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY (AES-256-GCM)
Network interceptionAll communication over HTTPS with TLS 1.3
Insider threatAudit logs capture all access; role-based access control
KMS service compromiseTwo replicas on separate nodes; encrypted backups
Leaked bearer tokenTokens expire after 7200s; IP allowlisting available
Git secret leakSecrets never exist in git; KMS is sole source of truth
CI/CD secret exfiltrationOnly KMS_CLIENT_ID and KMS_CLIENT_SECRET in CI; short-lived tokens

Zero-Trust Principles

  1. Every service authenticates independently: No shared credentials between services. IAM has its own Machine Identity; Gateway has its own. Compromising one does not compromise another.
  2. Minimum privilege: Machine Identities get Viewer role (read-only) on their specific project. No service can read another service's secrets.
  3. No implicit trust: Even services within the same K8s namespace must authenticate with KMS. Network proximity grants no privilege.
  4. Short-lived credentials: Bearer tokens expire. Even if captured from a log or network trace, they become useless within hours.

Encryption

  • At rest: AES-256-GCM encryption of all secret values in SQL. The ROOT_ENCRYPTION_KEY is a 256-bit key generated during initial setup and stored as a K8s Secret.
  • In transit: TLS 1.3 for all API communication. The KMS Ingress terminates TLS with a certificate from Let's Encrypt (via cert-manager).
  • In memory: Secret values exist in plaintext only in the KMS application process memory during request handling. They are not cached in KV or written to temporary files.

Compliance Mapping

FrameworkRequirementHow KMS Satisfies
SOC 2 CC6.1Logical access securityMachine Identity auth, RBAC
SOC 2 CC6.3Access revocationIdentity deletion, token expiry
SOC 2 CC7.2System monitoringAudit logs, access tracking
HIPAA 164.312(a)Access controlPer-project isolation, RBAC
HIPAA 164.312(e)Transmission securityTLS 1.3
GDPR Art. 32Security of processingAES-256-GCM, audit trail
PCI DSS 3.4Render PAN unreadableEncryption at rest
# compose.yml - DO NOT DO THIS
environment:
  DATABASE_URL: "postgresql://user:password@host:5432/db"
  API_KEY: "sk-live-abc123"

After (KMS-backed):

# compose.yml
environment:
  KMS_CLIENT_ID: "${KMS_CLIENT_ID}"
  KMS_CLIENT_SECRET: "${KMS_CLIENT_SECRET}"
# Service fetches all other secrets from KMS at startup

From a pile of stored CI secrets

Before — one stored value per credential, each rotated by hand in every repository that held it:

env:
  DOCKERHUB_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }}
  DOCKERHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }}
  DO_ACCESS_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.DIGITALOCEAN_ACCESS_TOKEN }}
  DATABASE_URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }}
  REDIS_URL: ${{ secrets.REDIS_URL }}

Three of those five no longer exist to store, which is the more interesting half of the migration: there is no registry password (the push authorizes with an IAM identity, HIP-0033), the build holds no cloud provider token because it does not deploy (HIP-0036), and a service reaches the shared store through egress rather than through a connection string of its own (HIP-0143, HIP-0144).

After — one stored identity, everything else fetched:

env:
  KMS_CLIENT_ID: ${{ secrets.KMS_CLIENT_ID }}
  KMS_CLIENT_SECRET: ${{ secrets.KMS_CLIENT_SECRET }}
# Fetch everything else from KMS at runtime

From kubectl create secret

Before (manual, error-prone):

kubectl create secret generic my-service-secrets \
  --from-literal=DB_URL=postgresql://... \
  --from-literal=API_KEY=sk-... \
  --from-literal=REDIS_URL=redis://...

After (automated):

# Apply once:
apiVersion: secrets.lux.network/v1alpha1
kind: KMSSecret
metadata:
  name: my-service-kms-sync
  namespace: hanzo
spec:
  hostAPI: https://kms.hanzo.ai
  resyncInterval: 60
  authentication:
    universalAuth:
      credentialsRef:
        secretName: my-service-kms-auth
        secretNamespace: hanzo
      secretsScope:
        projectSlug: my-service
        envSlug: production
        secretsPath: /
  managedSecretReference:
    secretName: my-service-secrets
    secretNamespace: hanzo
    secretType: Opaque
# Secrets auto-sync every 60 seconds. No manual steps.

Operational Procedures

Adding a New Service to KMS

  1. Create a project in KMS UI (kms.hanzo.ai) with slug matching the service name.
  2. Add environments: dev, staging, production.
  3. Add all secret key-value pairs to each environment.
  4. Create a Machine Identity named <service>-service.
  5. Enable Universal Auth on the identity.
  6. Grant the identity Viewer role on the project.
  7. Create the bootstrap K8s secret:
    kubectl create secret generic <service>-kms-auth \
      --from-literal=clientId=<id> \
      --from-literal=clientSecret=<secret> \
      --dry-run=client -o yaml | kubectl apply -f -
    
  8. Apply the KMSSecret resource (see specification above).
  9. Verify sync: kubectl get secret <service>-secrets -o yaml

Rotating a Machine Identity Secret

  1. In KMS UI, navigate to the Machine Identity.
  2. Regenerate the client secret (old secret remains valid for a grace period).
  3. Update the bootstrap K8s secret:
    kubectl create secret generic <service>-kms-auth \
      --from-literal=clientId=<id> \
      --from-literal=clientSecret=<new-secret> \
      --dry-run=client -o yaml | kubectl apply -f -
    
  4. The KMS Operator will use the new credentials on next resync cycle.
  5. Verify by checking operator logs for successful sync.

Emergency Secret Revocation

If a secret is suspected compromised:

  1. Rotate the secret value in KMS UI immediately.
  2. Revoke the Machine Identity if the identity credentials were compromised (not just the secret value).
  3. Force resync by deleting and re-creating the KMSSecret resource.
  4. Restart affected pods to pick up the new K8s Secret values:
    kubectl rollout restart deployment/<service>
    
  5. Review audit logs to determine the scope of the breach.

References

  1. luxfi/kms -- the primitives all server logic lives in
  2. HIP-5: Post-Quantum Security for AI Infrastructure
  3. HIP-4: LLM Gateway
  4. NIST SP 800-57: Key Management
  5. Kubernetes Secrets Best Practices
  6. SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria

Conformance status

Measured on 2026-09-09.

Ships. kmssecrets.kms.hanzo.ai/v1 is installed and reconciled, with 174 KMSSecret resources live across the estate — hanzo-build, collab, enso, extract-svc and others. A representative resource carries exactly the fields §KMSSecret specifies (projectSlug, envSlug, secretsPath, keys, rename, managedSecretName, creationPolicy) plus transport: iam, so the operator reaches KMS with an IAM identity rather than a bespoke token — which is the authentication §Authenticating specifies, already in production. kms.hanzo.ai/v1/health returns 200 with a build revision.

Corrected in this revision. §Authentication and §Secret Retrieval documented POST /api/v1/auth/universal-auth/login and GET /api/v3/secrets/raw, which both return 404 and carry an /api/ prefix no Hanzo surface uses. They described the third-party product this standard was originally derived from rather than the server that answers. They are replaced by the IAM client_credentials flow and api.hanzo.ai/v1/kms.

Still open, and the reason this HIP is not Final. Two deployments of one service hold the data between them — api.hanzo.ai/v1/kms and the standalone at kms.hanzo.ai, which every chart's kmsSecrets still reaches through the CRD's hostAPI. That is one program deployed twice with its data split, not two architectures, and it must never be written up as one. A name present in one and absent from the other returns total: 0 from the wrong door, which is indistinguishable from a secret that never existed. HIP-0136 §Migration carries the collapse sequence; until it lands, "which KMS" is a question a reader can still be forced to ask, and that is exactly the question this standard exists to delete.

The isolation goal remains unmet. One project per org means one machine identity per namespace, so any app in a namespace can read any path in that project. secretsPath organizes; it does not authorize. Closing it means one machine identity per app, which is a change of identity topology and belongs in its own proposal.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.